Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Security fix released for Apple AirPort Extreme Ba

Saturday, September 4th, 2010

The update for the Fast Ethernet version of Airport Extreme and the Gigabit Ethernet editions is available on from Apple support. Earlier this week Apple released an update for its Safari browser, along with an ominbus security update for Mac OS X.

Apple credits Alex deVries for reporting the AFP vulnerability.

Apple released on Wednesday a security update for the AirPort Extreme Base Station with 802.11n.

The Firmware 7.3.1
update addresses the Apple Filing Protocol (AFP) vulnerability detailed in CVE-2008-1012.

Apple said there is an input validation issue in the way AirPort Extreme Base Station validates AFP requests. A maliciously crafted AFP request may cause file sharing to become unresponsive. This issue does not affect Time Capsule or AirPort Express.

Device could prevent baggage carousel hell

Saturday, September 4th, 2010

The pair also developed a less sophisticated, less expensive gizmo–a $4 strip that fits onto a suitcase and flashes LEDS in four different colors once it hits the carousel. The owner of the baggage sets the light combination.

(Credit:
Israel21C)

(Via Israel 21C)

The gadget comes courtesy of Israeli developer Yoav Ben-David and his partner, Zvi Kanor of American Express Travel in Tel Aviv. It consists of a circular receiver on a keychain and a credit card-size transmitter that goes around the handle of your baggage.

The Easy-2-Pick, expected out this fall for $15 to $20, is a handheld device that lights up, beeps, and vibrates once your suitcase makes it onto the carousel and within 40 to 50 feet of where you’re standing. The heads-up gives you a chance to stand away from the crowd, possibly avoiding an elbow in the gut as you try to locate your lookalike bag.

I wish I’d had the Easy-2-Pick electronic luggage tag in hand Sunday night. I was just off a long-delayed flight that appeared to transport the entire population of Southern California to San Francisco. And wouldn’t you know it? Ninety percent of the seemingly millions of passengers jostling for their suitcases seemed to have the same black bag.

What Sun’s acquisition of MySQL means for the soft

Monday, August 30th, 2010

commentary

Sun is directly competing with Red Hat to become the heart of the open-source business community. I’ve written before that either Red Hat with its operating system or MySQL with its database could become the center of an alternative ecosystem to the Proprietary Bloc (Oracle, Microsoft, and IBM). With Sun at the helm of MySQL, MySQL just became a lot more credible in this role as it now has cash to match its ambition.
Sun will be a top suitor for open-source companies. I’ve written on this before, too, but now that Sun has acquired MySQL it will be easier for other open-source companies to follow suit. If Sun does a better job with this acquisition than Red Hat did with JBoss, Sun may well become the preferred destination for open-source companies that are amenable to acquisition (and everyone is at the right price).
Just as ex-JBossers have gone on to start/join other open-source companies, MySQL should flower into a few spin-off companies, as well. Hopefully (for Sun), this won’t happen immediately. But over the medium turn it will be excellent to have MySQL’s open-source savvy, battle-hardened team back in the market forming new open-source ventures. JBoss is working for us at LoopFuse, Red Hat, Appcelerator, XAware, and others (including one that is very stealth but which is also hugely interesting given one key person involved). This is good for the industry. We need this experience and the cash plowed back into commercial open source.
It demonstrates that open source is worth an excellent multiple. No, we’re not in Web 2.0 funny money land, but that’s a good thing. The multiples/valuations we’ve seen for XenSource, MySQL, JBoss, and Zimbra demonstrate healthy demand and healthy respect for open source.
There are really only three big open-source vendors. Sun, Red Hat, and…Yahoo. I could maybe throw Google in that mix, as well, but Google doesn’t yet seem to be taking the public approach to aggressively releasing and acquiring open source as part of its business methodology–at least, not to the same degree as Yahoo. These are likely to be the big aggregators of open-source companies.
Oracle may be in for a fight as it attempts to consolidate the industry around its proprietary platform. Sun (and Red Hat) is offering an open-source alternative to proprietary lock-in on a massive scale. With Sun’s reputation for quality, it may well be able to help grow the mission-critical image of software like MySQL such that the open-source ecosystem will even more effectively compete against the Proprietary Bloc. That’s it for now. I’m sure I’ll think of more. Exciting times to be in the open-source revolution. Burn the boats.

In no particular order:

Sun Microsystems has acquired MySQL for $1 billion in cash and options. That’s now old news. The implications of the deal, however, have yet to be felt, but this deal means several key things for open source.

New CMOS sensors catching on in cameras

Sunday, August 29th, 2010

Canon builds its own CMOS sensor. Shown here is a silicon wafer with high-end "full-frame" image sensors

CMOS’s reputation in digital imaging has suffered from inflated expectations.

Phase One, which uses Kodak CCD sensors, agrees. “For the 50- to 80-megapixel sensors on the horizon, we still feel the CCD will be the best way forward,” said PhaseOne Chief Executive Henrik Hakonsson. “We are carefully monitoring CMOS all the time, but for the customers we working for we have not found the quality we’re looking for.”

CCD today leads CMOS when it comes to performance and a wider bright-to-dark range, said Fas Mosleh, CMOS market segment manager for professional and applied imaging at Eastman Kodak, but because CMOS sensors can ride the coattails of the rest of the chipmaking business, CMOS outdoes CCD in one very important domain: price.

Where CCD still has the edge
“One problem with CMOS is it’s difficult to get the manufacturing process optimized both for the imaging part and the processing part,” DeLuca said. In contrast, “CCD technology was built for imaging. The architecture was set up to optimize the imaging characteristics available on the silicon.”

Because that conversion happens earlier in the image-handling pipeline, before image data is transferred off the sensor, there’s less opportunity other camera electronics to sully the image with noise. In digital photography, noise takes the form of colored speckles, and it’s a major bane, especially when shooting in dim conditions.

Sony, like Canon, builds its own CMOS sensors. Using CMOS means that some processing can be done on the sensor chip, including the conversion of analog information produced by the light being photographed into digital signals. Sony’s 12-megapixel A700 sensor has more than 4,000 analog-to-digital converters, said Mark Weir, Sony’s technical prod manager for digital cameras.

In compact cameras, CCD still dominates. Where CMOS has caught on most widely is videocameras, mobile phone cameras, and notably, SLR cameras. In this latter category new CMOS-based cameras include Nikon’s D3 and D300, Sony’s Alpha A700, and Pentax’s K20D, and Samsung’s GX20, which is derived from Pentax’s K20D. All these cameras top the companies’ respective lines, and the Pentax and Samsung cameras are being shown off here at the Photo Marketing Association trade show here.

But in the long run, Weir still gives CMOS the edge. “Are there long-term advantage suggest that transition will take place? Probably.”

LAS VEGAS–You may not know it from the outside, but digital cameras are getting something like an eye transplant.

Kodak has begun selling a 5-megapixel CMOS sensor–and the company’s camera division is the first customer, using the chip in the low-end $99 Easyshare C513. But the company also has a business selling some of the biggest image sensors around: 39-megapixel CCDs used by medium-format camera companies such as Hasselblad and Phase One. These measure a whopping 48×36mm, twice the surface area of a full frame of 35mm film (though not as large as medium-format film).

(Credit:
Pentax)

Pentax makes the move to CMOS
John Carlson, Pentax’ product manager for imaging systems, is outspoken on the CMOS advantages for SLRs. “Lower power is the key thing,” he said; it enables more shots per battery, smaller batteries, or more energy for image-processing tasks. Pentax buys its K20D’s CMOS sensor from Samsung.

“Because it’s a standardized process, with high-volume production, the pricing is very competitive. It’s better than CCD and getting better,” Mosleh said. Kodak, a digital imaging pioneer, builds its own CCD sensors and and more recently started designing CMOS sensors to be built by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp. and IBM, so it’s relatively neutral in the debate over which technology is superior.

Deep within every digital camera is a sensor chip whose job it is to capture light. Most camera sensors today use CCD (charge-coupled device) technology, but a newer approach called CMOS (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) is catching on, particularly at the high end of the market.

Pentax's K20D, the company's new top-end camera, is the first SLR from the company to employ a CMOS sensor.

CMOS also sensors can power a live view of the scene on the camera’s LCD, a feature that’s universal in compact cameras but still a relative novelty among SLRs. CCDs get too hot and consume too much power for live view on the large sensors used in SLRs, Carlson said.

CCD sensors are still widely used, though, in part because many more years of work have been invested into milking the most out of the process, said Mike DeLuca, Kodak’s CCD market manager for professional and applied imaging.

“For those customers, the first, second, and third priority is the image quality the sensor provides,” DeLuca said.

CMOS itself has been around for decades–it’s the method used to manufacture the vast majority of computer processors–but its use as an image sensor rather than an information processor is a relatively new development. In recent years it’s begun making inroads against CCD, a technology with many more years of refinement in image sensor technology.

In this rarefied atmosphere, where camera equipment costs tens of thousands of dollars, CCD still rules the roost. In part that’s because a camera doesn’t need to shoot at high speeds, and in part because consuming a lot of battery power isn’t a top-level problem.

CMOS advantages can include lower noise, lower power consumption, lower price, and faster response times. In the prestigious and fast-growing digital SLR (single-lens reflex) camera market, Canon and Olympus have used CMOS sensors for years, but high-profile new arrivals on the CMOS bandwagon include Sony, Pentax, Samsung, and most notably Nikon.

“It has been for some time generally held that CMOS technology in image sensors will overtake CCD at some point. I would say that three or four years ago, the predictions were that by the time 2007 or 2008 rolled around, CMOS would be done replacing CCD,” Weir said. “History has shown those predictions were premature.”

(Credit:
Canon)

iPhone remote control app goes live

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

Most new Apple products already come with remote-control devices that perform the same functions, but using the iPhone download conveniently renders them vestigial–if you have an iPhone, that is.

As expected,
iPhone and
iPod Touch owners can now use their devices as remote controls for their iTunes libraries and Apple TV boxes.

You can turn your iPhone or iPod Touch into a remote control with this new app.

(Credit:
Apple)

The feature is now available as a download in the new iPhone applications store, which went live on Thursday morning. With the free, one-megabyte application installed, an iPod Touch or iPhone can use a Wi-Fi connection to control and search through an iTunes library remotely, flip around on an Apple TV, and control AirTunes speakers.

Top tech and no cell phone

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

The
iPod’s 2001 introduction also earned top honors in a readers’ poll on the top pop culture moment of the last 25 years. It managed to knock out Michael Jackson’s “Thriller” video, Kurt Cobain’s suicide and Ellen DeGeneres’ “Coming Out” episode. Both Cobain and Jackson made it to the semifinals before a “late surge by Apple fans edged them out.” Never underestimate the power of fanboys.

Though it started out as a good read the last article forced me to put down the magazine in disgust–I even made it past Die Hard earning ninth place in the top 100 best films from 1983 to 2008. In the list of “The 25 gadgets and innovations with the biggest effect on pop culture since 1983″ I was aghast to find the cell phone nowhere on the list. How could a gadget that revolutionized Hollywood business deals, spawned a celebrity accessory culture and served as the main plot device in such cinematic achievements as Cellular get beaten out by the likes of the Amazon Kindle and stadium multiplex seating? To me, it’s completely unfathomable. Of course, the iPod and TiVo landed in the top five (how could TiVo not make it?) but satellite radio hardly deserves its ninth-place ranking. Here’s the tech that made the top ten.

Poor little cell phones

The DVD player
Napster
TiVo
iPod
YouTube
Realistic CG characters
Digital video cameras for consumers
Flat panel TVs
Satellite radio stations
Stadium multiplex seating

(Credit:
Kent German/CNET Networks)

It’s always a good day at our house when the latest issue of Entertainment Weekly arrives in the mailbox. And when last week’s summer double issue arrived, an already good day was made even better. I love top 10 lists, but Entertainment Weekly managed to maximize my pleasure with an entire issue dedicated to “Celebrating the new classics: The 1,000 best movies, TV shows, albums, books, and more of the past 25 years.”

So what do you think? Do you agree that the cell phone was robbed of its deserved place on the list? And tell me about any other tech that you think Entertainment Weekly overlooked.

Intel’s power-guzzling V8

Monday, August 23rd, 2010

Is all of this really necessary? Or is it just a PR stunt with only a few hardened gamers snapping up the limited supply of Skulltrails. Apparently it’s more than PR because Skulltrail reviews, driven by popular demand, are everywhere. TechRadar
has one, [H]Enthusiast has one, Anandtech has one…and the list goes on.

Skulltrail’s genesis (it was originally dubbed “V8″) is sketchy but some in the tech community
believe the board was created in response to AMD’s Quad FX platform which, in turn, was created in response to Intel’s quad-core desktop CPUs. But AMD’s Quad FX was unceremoniously terminated so that question may be moot now. For those interested in seeing one in action, here’s a slightly dated (January 8) Intel video showing Skulltrail running various games.

Intel Skulltrail motherboard

Intel is getting ready to launch the full-sized SUV of desktop motherboards. Expected later this quarter, the Skulltrail board packs two quad-core 130-watt QX9775 processors–which Legit Reviews said sucked up to a whopping 351 watts. In short, this is not the MacBook Air. The tiny processor in that power-stingy computer sips a mere 20 watts.

Skulltrail pulls out all the stops. It has dual 1600-MHz front side-buses connected to dual Xeon sockets and four full PCIe x16 slots, with planned support for up to four high-end graphics boards. And Xeon processors running on Skulltrail boards have been demonstrated by Intel running at 4.0GHz.

(Credit:
Intel Corp.)

What is Intel vPro exactly

Monday, August 23rd, 2010

One of vPro’s marquee features is the ability to access a computer even if it has been turned off. This can be done on either a wired or a secure wireless network. And laptops outside the company firewall can be accessed with the newest versions of software and hardware, according to Intel.

Intel also introduced two motherboards Monday supporting all of the new Intel vPro features. Aimed at channel customers, the DQ45CB is for standard-sized PCs and the DQ45EK is for small-form-factor systems.

Intel, of course, is a chipmaker and so there is plenty of silicon that goes along with the package. The third-generation vPro suite (formerly code-named McCreary) uses Core 2 quad-core or dual-core processors in combination with Q45 Express Chipset, the 82567LM Gigabit Network Connection, and Intel Active Management technology 5.0. Mobile chipsets, such as the GM, PM, and GS Express chipsets also support vPro.

For example, a feature called Remote Alert will “call” IT on its own if the PC is experiencing problems “outside preset parameters,” Intel said.

Understandable because vPro is an under-the-hood, non-performance-driven technology that falls off many PC users’ radar screens. In essence, vPro allows PCs to be fixed and maintained remotely, potentially saving businesses money because they don’t incur the cost of IT staffing levels necessary if maintenance was done at each PC on site.

Does Intel vPro ring any bells? Not for most people. The newest version of vPro software and accompanying Intel hardware introduced Monday won’t command the attention paid to an Intel processor rollout.

Intel says this is also good for the service provider, allowing broader access to customers. Initially, Intel Remote PC Assist will be available in North America.

And for small businesses which may need immediate help with PC problems, Intel introduced Remote PC Assist Technology that connects businesses with service providers. After the business user enters a key sequence, the service providers can use vPro to solve problems.

Microchip, ON propose $2.3 billion deal for Atmel

Monday, August 23rd, 2010

The letter follows earlier discussions between Atmel and Microchip.

Atmel also said that if the deal goes through, it intends to dispose of Atmel’s ASIC business upon completing the acquisition or shortly thereafter, and has spoken to an interested third party about the sale.

Microchip Technology and On Semiconductor have made a $2.3 billion bid for semiconductor maker Atmel Corp., the companies announced Thursday.

In a statement, Atmel said its board of directors would “review and consider the proposal in due course.”

The plan calls for Microchip to lead the acquisition and then sell Atmel’s nonvolatile-memory and RF and automotive businesses to ON to partly finance the deal. ON said it would finance its purchase using a combination of existing cash resources, borrowings under its existing credit facility and additional financing.

The two companies sent a letter to Atmel CEO Steven Laub proposing a $5 per share buyout, which represents a 52 percent premium over Atmel’s closing share price on October 1, 2008.

“We appreciate your having taken the time to meet with (Microchip CEO) Steve Sanghi on September 5th to discuss Microchip’s potential acquisition of Atmel,” the letter says. “However, we were deeply disappointed to learn subsequently that the Atmel Board of Directors appears unwilling to consider a transaction at this time under any circumstances.”

Atmel designs and manufactures microcontrollers, advanced logic, mixed-signal, nonvolatile memory, and radio frequency (RF) components.

Wildscreen TV lets video creators cash in, not sel

Monday, August 23rd, 2010

I’ve embedded a sample video below. To see the video page, click here.

Wildscreen TV is quite file friendly, which I’m a fan of. It’ll take any length and any size of video that you can throw at it with ease. The uploader supports multiple files at once and gives you plenty of stats along the way, such as how much time is left and the total percentage of how far it’s gone. Both the 12MB and 150MB test videos I uploaded were processed and showed up on my video list in less than two minutes, which is phenomenal.

As with other broadcast video hosts, content creators can make their own channels. What’s especially cool is that the entire page can be skinned to the creator’s liking. When used correctly you can achieve similar results to some of the special branded pages on YouTube that advertisers and companies are paying to get. Also, the advertising is completely customizable, and you can bring in ad units from Google, Amazon, AdBright, and eBay.

Wildscreen is off to a great start. The quality of the player and the generous hosting options offer a lot more than some big name video-hosting services. I also like that it’s open to several advertising options–which means you won’t have to sign up for something new if you’ve got a system you’re already using.

Wildscreen TV is a video host for film or clip makers who want to make some money off their work without having to build their own sites. Content creators who put up their videos get 100 percent of the ad revenue and access to a great video player that converts source footage into DVD-resolution streams. It’s not as pretty as some of the “HD” quality streams from providers like Vimeo, DailyMotion, or Motionbox, but if your source content is good it looks simply fantastic.